Monthly Archive for December, 2005

Training the generations

At a simplistic level, it’s possible to make generalizations about people. The simplest one is one we all know: men and women! Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. Defend the Caveman, or have Vagina Monologues. Although generalizations, all of these books and shows strike a chord with us, because we see patterns of behaviour, and underlying attitudes that make sense of our own experiences with men and women. Similarly, it’s possible to show that today’s work force is made up of four distinct generations – the Silent generation (born 1930s and 40s), the Boomers (born 1950s and 60s), the Xers (born 1970s to mid 1980s), and the Millennial generation (born mid 1980s to present). Your problem is that you’ve got members of each one in your next training session.

Generational theory is a relatively new science, looking at the influences on people of the era in which they grew up. Much academic work has been completed around the world, on every continent. In South Africa, academic studies, and field research are confirming that generational issues are valid here as well. But not too many people have started to unpack the implications of generational theory for various aspects of life.

TomorrowToday.biz is one of the world’s leading consultancies using generational theory and applying it to organisations. In this email we start a series of articles that will attempt to unpack some of these applications. Much more detail can be found at http://www.tomorrowtoday.biz/mindthegap

The challenge for trainers and teachers (and in fact, presenters and facilitators, too) comes from a clash of the generations: a collision of values, expectations, ambitions and attitudes. At the start of the 21st century, it’s increasingly likely that participants in a training course are a more age-diverse group than ever before. The traditional hierarchies that once kept generations together and isolated one age group from another no longer exist. Talent and merit are quickly overtaking length of service and experience as the deciding factor in advancement. The problem for trainers is that each generation has a unique perspective on the world, and in particular has unique preferences for acquiring, digesting, organising, and applying information and skills. Understanding these generational differences is vital to those who must try to impart the values, culture, knowledge and skills upon which the success of a business depends.

A brief summary of the four generations in the workplace at the moment:

Silent Generation were born before and during the Great Depression and World War II. They are conservative, hard-working and structured, preferring rules, order and formal hierarchies. They are founts of great wisdom, having lived through some of humanity’s most profound change-moments in the last 8 decades.

Baby Boomers are the postwar generation, the drugs, sex, rock ‘n’ roll set who grew up during a time of grand visions. They invented “Thank God, it’s Monday!� and the 60-hour (plus) workweek. Boomers are passionately concerned about participation in the workplace, motivated by vision and strategy, and care about creating a fair and level playing field for all.

Generation Xers grew up as “latchkey kids� during the era of crises (from Watergate to June 16, 1976; from the energy crisis to the collapse of communism). They need options and flexibility; they dislike close supervision, preferring freedom and an outputs-driven system. They love change so much they actually need it. Xers strive for balance in their lives - They work to have a life; they don’t live to work.

Millennial kids are the upcoming optimists, willing to co-operate, work and learn. They value diversity – often not even noticing it. They are confident – almost arrogantly so. They seem destined to become “good scouts.� Bill Strauss and Neil Howe, authors of Generations, predict they will inherit the mantle of patriotism and self-sacrifice personified by the GI generation (the generation who came before the Silents, represented by such people as Nelson Mandela, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Walter Cronkite and others).

Dealing with this diversity of ages, values and worldviews can be a difficult job. But knowing how members of each generation prefer information to be organised, the type of teacher/trainer that appeals to each, which activities they respond to, and learning formats to which they gravitate will give you an advantage as a multi-generational presenter, trainer, teacher and facilitator.

Silent Generation

This generation prefers a learning environment that is structured and risk-free. The Silents tend to enjoy conformity, appreciate consistency, logic and discipline, and prefer content to be anchored in precedent or related to a tried-and-trusted method. Its not surprising then, that they prefer a traditional setting, with a classroom-style layout. They prefer trainers with a conservative style, especially those who establish ground rules early (and then stick to them).

They tend to dislike informality and too much familiarity. They certainly do not like overly casual dress and speech. Do not use slang, and steer clear of anything that may be considered rude or offensive (such as risqué jokes, swearing and even bad use of grammar). Many Silents are turned off by personal anecdotes, examples and stories, preferring more “left-brained,� logical material. Don’t rush things – they prefer to take all training slightly slower than some of their wired young colleagues. They prefer to an outline up front – and they will not appreciate the trainer deviating from this plan.

The ideal trainer is a knowledgeable expert. Silents believe in positional authority, and will be respectful of their trainer. Younger trainers may have to quickly establish credibility, either by including a detailed CV in the course notes, or by an early introduction that includes their qualifications for the particular session. Trainers can also establish rapport by acknowledging the participant’s background and experience, and by listening carefully and respectfully when they talk.

Silents do not like to be put on the spot with questions or group interaction – especially in a mixed age group when there are lots of younger participants. They are the least likely of all participants to interrupt or confront the trainer if they disagree. As a result, trainers may not know whether there is actual buy-in to the session until the end-of-session evaluation forms are collected. Informal feedback can be obtained during breaks in the training.

Silents are motivated to learn when training is tied to the overall good of the company. Their preferred learning style is linear, progressive, factual, information-rich, goal-directed, stable, orderly, and risk-free. Training activities that appear to work best are the classical, straightforward presentation of information. Silents prefer to build their skills privately, rather than in a group context. If budget allows, one-on-one skills training (especially technology-related training) is ideal – and much more effective.

Training materials for Silents should be in summary form (Reader’s Digest type formats). Avoid small font sizes and “funky� font styles, and ensure grammar and spelling are perfect. Do not expect them to access the Internet to download course notes – they may be capable of doing so, but still prefer to get paper in their hands.

Boomers

The preferred learning environment of the Baby Boomer is interactive and nonauthoritarian. Although they like things to follow a predictable, linear direction, they also respond well to brainstorming, “lateral thinking�, “how to� sessions (they support the world’s massive self-help, motivational industry), interactive (allowing for participant input and team collaboration), competitive, and motivational. They are not intimidated by physical contact and interaction, and excel in small team work. They can respond well to the traditional classroom as long as there are opportunities for interaction, networking and teamwork.

The ideal trainer is a knowledgeable friend, with good facilitation skills. Boomers respond best to trainers who are perceived as an equal, collegiate, vulnerable, personal, yet have recognised qualifications in the subject. Many of them have authority issues, and they resent power plays. Trainers who give personal examples and share their own vulnerability will be well accepted. They are motivated to learn if they believe the knowledge and skills they are acquiring will give them new ways to excel at work.

According to a study conducted by The Boomer Institute in Cleveland, Boomers’ need to prove their worthiness has created a work ethic that can be called dedicated and driven. They are dedicated learners as well: Boomers tend to be optimistic, self-help driven, motivated, and are fascinated by the role of spirit in their lives, even their professional lives. Boomers challenge everything and try to change things to be the way they “should� be. It’s good, therefore, to focus on personal challenges. Boomers want to solve problems and turn things around.

Any interactive training activities are effective with Boomers, but most hate role-play. Boomers have a tendency to intellectualise, and often remain unaware that they’ve not translated knowledge into skills. They also focus more on strategic thinking and vision, than short term implementation and action. Practicing skills will be critical, though they don’t like to be shown up publicly. Watch for the “know it all� Boomer with a chip on the shoulder. He may know a lot, but its often only theoretical, and not being applied.

Training materials that suit Boomers are structured to ensure that information is readily accessible. A hyperlinked website is a perfect example: there’s an overview of information in a friendly, easy-to-scan format, and if interested, more detailed information is easily accessible. Most international news magazines are structured like this as well. The look and feel of the material must be professional and slick.

Generation X

Xers are not nearly as attracted to classroom interaction as the generations before them. They have grown up increasingly frustrated at how out-of-date traditional schooling is with the real world. Its not surprising then, that their preferred learning environment is self-directed, and focused at lifelong learning. They prefer interactive, active, multi-tasking, non-linear, multi-media (consider using CDs, videos and computer-based training, CBT), multi-style, and fun-filled learning, and are motivated especially when this is related to personal skills development and increasing personal marketability. They do not have an eye on a certification, but rather on real-life skills.

The ideal trainer is a guide. Irrespective of age or experience, a trainer who is seen to be proficient in the subject, regardless of qualifications, and who gets right into the material to demonstrate their expertise will elicit the best response from Xers. They will not respect the trainer by default – respect will have to be earned.

They are highly motivated learners who ask a lot of questions, and want interaction. If they are interested they will do additional research - provide information to assist them in that process, and leave it up to them to do it. Give them plenty of space. There may be a need to help them, but err on the side of freedom: The teacher must set them on a course and then leave them generally alone to see where it will take them, giving them opportunity to sample and learn by doing. They are easily bored, and require regular changes in pace, process and style. Chop and change – surprise them regularly.

You can’t put enough role-play into training programs geared to Xers. They want to get involved with what they’re learning, experiment with it and get feedback. If theory is required, try and edutain (entertain with knowledge), and keep it as brief as possible. Then get back to interactive learning. They aren’t worried about putting their reputations on the line, and they’ll jump in and try something even at the cost of looking clumsy in front of others.

Xers respond best to training materials with fewer words than those designed for older generations. They don’t read as much as their older—or younger—colleagues, and are attracted to pages that provide lots of visual stimulation—headlines, subheads, quotes, graphics and lists. Take a look at magazines like Spin and Fast Company to see what we mean.

Millennial Generation

The Millennials are a powerful generation, who have a holistic perspective, anticipating needed change, and with the flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances. They are difficult to intimidate, and free of fear. Failure doesn’t frighten them. In a recent study by Northwestern Mutual Life and the Harris organization of the attitudes and behaviors of students, respondents felt the most affinity to their World War II-era grandparents and great-grandparents. They subscribe to a stricter moral code, care about manners, and believe in civic action. Neil Howe suggests these new workers will need more supervision and structure than their Xer predecessors. “The younger new entrants to the workplace will be looking for more attention and structure from the authority figure,� he says. Their preferred learning environment combines personal challenge, teamwork and technology. In a training room with lots of Millennials, give everyone a task. When a few have completed it, encourage them to walk around the room and help others.

The ideal trainer is an experienced mentor. They appreciate a trainer who is able to give attention and structure to the material. They respond well to authority figures, and respect qualifications and expertise. Be non-linear and use extensive multi-media. Use many different techniques to get a point across. Let them know the practical benefit of what they are learning - do this at the start.

Millennials are motivated to learn skills and information that will help make their working lives less stressful, and will move them closer to achieving personal potential and passions in the workplace. They would enjoy training courses (or at least application of sections of courses) that go beyond simple job functionality (in fact, more and more companies will be expected to provide such courses as: good parenting, marriage skills, personal financial management, health and wellness, and so on). They are more economically motivated than Xers, and training motivation can be linked to this. They are also attracted to learning that doesn’t just teach content, but also teaches process as well – so that they can continue learning and developing well after the course is over.

Like Xers, Millennials prefer training activities that are entertaining in themselves. Training materials that suit them are lively and varied. Printed materials should have the same multiple focal points as the materials targeted at Xers - with one exception. Millennials are readers, so include reprints of articles and written backup information, and lots of links to webpages.

All Together Now…

What if you’ve got members of all four of these generations in one training course? There isn’t a simple, one-size-fits-all solution here, but the best advice we can offer is to learn as much as you can about each participant (or at least each participating generation), and work to respond to their specific preferences. This will take some creative thought and programming. Think options, options, options. You also need to ask yourself about the various dynamics you can create – putting the generations into multi-generational, layered small groups will produce tension, but this may be creatively used. Putting them into homogenous groups will tend to reinforce generational stereotypical thinking, but this may assist you in meeting each participant’s learning needs.

It’s certainly helpful to know the sociology of each of the four generations. That way, you can acknowledge and use their icons, language and values. Also make a concerted effort to use examples that will appeal to a variety of generations.

Assume the best about people. Successful trainers treat everyone as if they have great things to offer and are motivated to do their best. Use the generational strengths. Design methods to overcome the weaknesses. Have fun!

References

Generations @ Work, by Ron Zemke, Claire Raines, Bob Filipczak.
Any of the books by Neil Howe and William Strauss.
Mind Over Money, by Graeme Codrington, Louis Fourie and Sue Grant-Marshall.
Mind the Gap, by Graeme Codrington, Sue Grant-Marshall
Generations website, by Graeme Codrington: http://www.tomorrowtoday.biz/mindthegap
Other books on generations listed here

Seven bribes for severance brothers

They’re leaving in their droves – this new breed of employees, and there seems little anyone can do about it. You invest time, money and effort into training them, only to be rewarded with: “Thanks for everything, I’m leaving.� And all you have to show for your costly investment in human capital is a one sentence resignation note, and your competitors’ smug smiles as they poach your talent.Sure high turnover is not a new battle that management faces, but these days the nature of the struggle is. It used to be that the best would stay and the mediocre would fall away – but now the best are leaving. Why? Because they can. And so we’re starting to feel the pinch of working in a free market environment – where the most talented individuals have the most negotiating power. Success is no longer determined by your position on the organizational chart (which gave managers their traditional power through the promise of promotion for performance), it’s determined by the marketable skills you have and the tangible results that have your name on it.

As for security, we’re living and moving in a post jobs era – with chaotic markets, and unstable resource needs. No more can companies offer the refuge of long-term employment to it’s employees. Security has become the responsibility of the individual, and the new generation of employees not only understands that, they’ve accepted it – and have risen to the challenge. They may look like disloyal job-hoppers, but in reality, their loyalty is to themselves (who will fend for them if they don’t?), and their job-hopping ensures continuous learning and the acquisition of new marketable skills.

That’s their predicament, and now that you have a little more insight into theirs - let’s look at yours: How do you retain these talented individuals? Remember: it’s the talented ones who’re leaving, and you want to keep them.

The simple answer is: “You can’t.� Long term employment is fast becoming history, and the sooner you accept that the better.

The knotty answer is: “You can, for a bit� – if you redefine long term employment. Let them go without saying goodbye, don’t slam the front door, and keep your back door wide open. Expect that they’ll work for you (and various other employers) on an “on and off� basis. One year as an employee, the next as a consultant, the next as a telecommuter or flexi-timer, then an employee again. Does it really matter what their title is – as long as the job gets done and you’re getting a return on your investment.

The toughest answer is: “You can� – if you radically restyle the contract. If you can’t offer security, you can’t ask for long-term commitment and loyalty. You can’t offer the security of long-term employment, so is there any other security on offer? The scary answer is that the more marketable and mobile your best employees feel, the more likely they are to stay with you. You have to develop them beyond their current job functions and ensure they’re continually developing.

That’s all good & well, but it still doesn’t answer the burning question – how exactly do we keep ‘em from leaving so soon! This is where the seven bribes come in handy … seven reasons that would motivate bright young things to stay on. It’s a framework that requires your input, and your personalization depending on the industry and business you’re in – it’s an ideas backbone, you add the flesh.

  • 1. Performance based compensation: Bright young things want to know that if they work harder and better they will be rewarded in direct proportion to the value they add. Pay for performance, nothing else – in fact, maybe it’s time to stop paying people and start buying their results.
  • 2. Flexibility is a big carrot. They want to know that as long as they’re meeting goals and deadlines; they will have some control over their own schedules (and even location) if possible. Why measure their input if it’s their output you really want? Is the right process as important as achieving the right product at the right time?
  • 3. Marketable Skills: “I’m gonna stick around if I’m continuously challenged at work, learning new proficiencies and improving myself all the time. As soon as the job becomes just a job, or I get bored – I’m gone.â€?
  • 4. Communication: Their security lies in their resourcefulness, and how will they know that they’re still needed if there’s no regular feedback. Forget 6 or 12 monthly reviews – try a word or two daily. Bruce Tulgan preaches FAST feedback – Frequent, Accurate, Specific and Timely.
  • 5. Recognition: Money moves people, recognition motivates them. Personal credit for results achieved, means they can put their names on concrete results. “I want a claim to fame, rather than simply making my boss look good!â€?
  • 6. Ownership: Two people can’t be responsible for the same task. Give them a clear area of responsibility and try not to look over their shoulders all the time – micromanagement is a morale killer. Be specific on goals and deadlines, then hand over the keys.
  • 7. Creative Expression (and fun): Messages like – “There aren’t a lot of rules here,â€? and “What do you think?â€? go a long way to give them a sense of the Sinatra Syndrome they long for … “I did it my way!â€?

Apply these principles and you might just hang on long enough to get a decent return on your investment – but the hard fact is that they’re likely to leave anyway… and that’s OK. Lifetime employment is only dead for those employers irrevocably attached to the old fashioned, one-size fits all model of hiring & firing (full-time, on site, uninterrupted). For those willing to reinvent their companies as fluid & flexible organizations – long live long term employment.

Failing your way to Innovation Success

What do the Jacuzzi, Champagne, Post-It notes and Viagra all have in common? They are all innovations that were failures at what they were originally designed for. They are also products that succeeded precisely because of this failure.

A recent survey identified ‘Innovation’ as the leading global strategic driver of 2005. Everyone wants to innovate. However, it has now become one of those words built into corporate values and strategies because of the need to “keep up with the Jones’s�. Few organisations understand the theory that supports innovation, and even fewer are prepared for the cost and implications of truly striving toward innovation. The reality is that innovation is always partnered with failure, but the word “failure� is never seen on the list of a corporate’s values. Kettering of GM fame called failure: “one of the greatest arts in the world�, and Thomas Watson snr of IBM maintained: “The fastest way to succeed is to double your failure rate.�

One of the problems that affect failure is the perception that failure is always a costly exercise and this is especially true if organisations don’t learn from failure. However, if structures are put in place that allow failure to be analysed, then it becomes an intangible asset that can be harnessed. There are a few things in your world that your competitors can never copy, and your failures fall into this category. Your failures are uniquely yours, so why not benefit from them?

How can failure help achieve innovation leadership?

1) See failure as an investment
Thomas Watson jnr was known as a supporter of people with unconventional ideas during his time at the helm of IBM. One of his vice presidents who had just lost $10 million on a ‘wild duck’ scheme was called to Watson’s office. Expecting the worst, the VP came with his resignation typed up and ready for submission. When he offered it to Watson it was rejected with these words: “Why would we want to lose you? We’ve just given you a $10 million education.�

2) Analyse failure and learn from it
Most people had a childhood experience where they tried something risky that failed catastrophically. Their parent’s response was: “I hope that you never try anything so stupid again!� We have brought this mindset into the corporate sector and when someone fails, we rarely stop to analyse and learn from the failure because we are in such a hurry to get away from the humiliation. It is at this moment that we truly fail, because the only true failure we can experience in innovation is that of not learning from what has gone wrong before.

3) Create safe space to share failures
3M has its legendary ‘Failure Forums’ where people who have tried and failed at something, gather to share their experiences and the problems they have faced. The Game Changer programme instituted in Royal Dutch Shell, under the oversight of Gary Hamel, is another example of this type of environment. One of the learnings that came out of this process was the realisation that many ideas came from employees who were not previously viewed as innovative or creative. The key was that the creation of a safe environment gave people the confidence to share ideas. Employees who had been inhibited were now able to contribute and collaborate in innovations that drove company success.

4) Focus on increasing the quantity of ideas generated, not just their quality
In comparison to their contemporaries Picasso, da Vinci & others like them had a similar ratio of success in the ideas they produced – the difference was, they produced more ideas. This meant that they had more successes and failures than their peers. Creativity and Innovation are not only the products of idea quality, but also idea volume. In the corporate world this means that we should not only be managing people toward the generation of quality ideas, but also aim for the generation of a high number of ideas. There is, however, a rider to this point. If organisations aren’t prepared to spend time and energy analysing and learning from failure then failed ideas will in fact erode value rather than create value. In this scenario, there isn’t sufficient capacity in the organisation to effectively absorb the implications of failure, and it would, instead be safer for the organisation to drop the illusion that they can be innovative.

5) Distinguish between excusable and inexcusable failure
In emphasising failure’s positive contributions to innovation, there is the danger that we may be left with the impression that it has been glorified beyond reason. This could not be further from the truth. The final point on positively harnessing failure is that all failure isn’t equal. Steve Wosniak, of Apple Computers renown, maintains that every failure contains information which if not learned will result in failure again and again. This type of failure is inexcusable failure. Excusable failure is restricted to being the first person in an organisation to fail in that manner – repetition of that same failure in any form, by anyone else in the organisation, is inexcusable. In such a situation, both individuals need to be taken to task. The first, for not sharing the learnings from their failure, and the second, for not taking the time to research and investigate their project and discovering the previous failure.

Edison’s attitude to “failure� is salutary. When asked why so many of his experiments failed, he explained that they were not failures. Instead he claimed, each time he had discovered a method that did not work.

In order to make “Innovation� more than just a word printed on posters, mugs, t-shirts, and caps we need to develop a realistic corporate cultural dynamic that embraces intelligent risk and inevitable failure. Successful businesses in the future will be those that have a “Failure Centre of Excellence� ensuring that no failure goes unanalysed, un-learned from, or un-applied.

If you’re not on Google, you can’t possibly be alive

As I sat there scratching my head, for how can you be alive and not be found on Google.com, I realised that a new criteria for existence has been born, and I had just tripped over it. A credit history is still mighty important but if you have no web history can you really exist?I was 23 years old, had just begun my first real job, and was on my way to sign up for my first mobile phone contract. This was back in 1993, mobile phones were just being born in South Africa, and if you can remember back then you’ll appreciate my excitement at having just been given a Hagenuk (aka, the original brick).I proudly strolled up to the person in the mobile phone shop, with ID documents, proof of salary, proof of residence, copy of bank statement, everything but a blood sample, ready to sign up. When I was asked if I had any accounts or credit with any other companies or stores, I confidently answered in the negative. This had been something I was very proud of at the age of 23 – I’d never had to borrow money. Or should I say, I’d never purchased anything I couldn’t pay for with cash.

You can imagine my shock and horror when I was told that without a credit history (rating), I couldn’t be approved and hence given a mobile phone contract. This was a new lesson for me. So out I went and opened 5 or 6 accounts at different stores, most of which I had never, and would probably never purchase anything from.

This is a lesson we all know, or as in my case learn very quickly in your late teens and early twenties; you gotta have credit to get credit. While there are a truck load of cynical views and conspiracy theories (some of which I agree with), regarding the pressure to have a credit history, I’m not going to use this space to discuss them. Rather, I’d like to suggest a new ‘credit rating’ for the information age. It shares some of the features of the old system, but has the same consequence… ‘if you’re not on the list, you can’t go to the party!’

If I may, I’d like to introduce it by way of a true story (or as close to the truth as I can get without endangering your and my life)…

Last week I was approached by someone to get involved in a joint venture. There was almost no risk to me other than time, and the upside if it came off seemed fairly attractive. The only problem was that I didn’t know the person very well, and most of our correspondence had been via e-mail, an accepted standard in today’s business world.

As I sat one afternoon, thinking through this venture I noticed that this potential new partner was using a ‘free’ e-mail address. One of the many available on the internet, most often used by students, travellers and people wanting to keep their details unknown and anonymous.

“Aha�, I thought to myself, as I fired up my frustratingly slow internet connection and browsed on over to Google.com (For those of you not completely familiar with Google.com, it is one of cyberspace’s biggest search engines, found at http://www.google.com). I crisply punched in my partner-to-be’s name, and found nothing. I tried their company name, still nothing. I even tried their e-mail address, still nothing.

As I sat their scratching my head, for how can you be alive and not be found on Google.com, I realised that a new criteria for existence has been born, and I had just tripped over it. A credit history is still mighty important but if you have no web history can you really exist?

Based on this new criteria I know I’m alive because when I go to Google.com and type in my name “Barrie Bramley� (the inverted commas are important), there are 84 matches, at last count, and they all have something to do with me. You can track my progress from around 1993 (the same year I got a mobile phone – mmhhh?) You can track my work history, my family history, and know that I have a life.

I’m not suggesting that we throw all previous methods and measures out and replace them with the Google.com test. However, I would like to suggest that as ‘on the edge’ as my point may sound, it is conceivable that companies and people, in the near future, will begin to make use of the Internet as a reference tool more and more.

Your existence will be confirmed by your presence on the great search engines of Cyber Space. It’s both a chilling and comforting idea. On the one hand all sorts of people, some of whom I will not know, will be able to ‘look me up’. They’ll have access to all kinds of information about me that I don’t necessarily want them to know. On the other hand I will have the ability to ‘look them up’ as well. The internet offers me, Joe public, access to a giant database from which I can make informed decisions about people’s existence based on their history recorded in Cyber Space. That’s real history by the way, not the virtual stuff we’ve become accustomed to talking about when we refer to the Internet.

Sure there are all kinds of flaws and loopholes that can be abused and misused. There’s nothing new about that. Things are changing, and my choices are to either embrace the new opportunities afforded by the change or, run and hide. I was never much of a runner.

Oh and just before you switch off and go home tonight, send me your name. I might just find some time to see if you’re alive.

The Dead: A Case in Point

Coffee shop laptopWalk into The Chatterbox, a coffee shop in Westville, KZN, South Africa (now you know exactly where it is!). Only having about 30 minutes, I order a muffin and coffee. Settle back and switch on my laptop. Damn… need power but no problem, my table has a plug point right next to it. Plug in and get to work. “Sorry Sir” the polite waitress says…
Continue reading ‘The Dead: A Case in Point’

Black Marketing

beerNot like the name suggests, this is a strand of marketing that is being borne out of how the Smoking Co’s have been cornered by global health legislation (and soon too the breweries!). Now that they’re no longer able to utlise the ‘tried and tested’ marketing channels, smoking companies are needing to prove themselves as being adept at pitching their product “below the line”.

Hence Black Marketing - the art of selling their product through face-to-face interactions i.e. Direct Marketing. Now direct marketing is not new. It is a marketing strategy that has been growing over the years in popularity as companies realise the intangibility of billboard advertising and realise the rewards of actually connecting with customers (e.g. at the bottom of this post).

Continue reading ‘Black Marketing’

Any bets on me getting a new DVD?

I bought my daughter the DVD of ‘Finding Nemo‘ a few months ago (not sure when?). As all well watched DVD’s are destined to do, this one cracked, and is no longer playable.

So here’s my theory on DVD’s you purchased legally, breaking: I’ve paid for the right to watch ‘Finding Nemo’ through the medium of this DVD. When I went to wherever I ended up buying it, I paid predominately for the license and not the medium (DVD). Let’s face it, the physical cost of the DVD is negligible. Hence the entertainment industry up in arms at the moment. They’re trying to stop us from duplicating the ‘license’ and not the DVD. So in theory then, when my DVD breaks, they should charge me just for a new DVD and not a new license. After all my DVD broke, and not my license. But I’m prepared to bet that they’re going to tell me I have to buy a new license as well as a new DVD and so end up paying the full price. If that’s the case then in theory I have two licenses and can legally make a copy of the DVD. Right? Let’s see. I say let’s see, because I’ve done this before.
Continue reading ‘Any bets on me getting a new DVD?’

Toilet humour

toiletMACHat tip to Brad Feld for this gem. Actually, for both - the iLoo (or toiletMAC, or PowerPOO) on the left and now the RSStroom Reader (shown on the right).

RSStroomThis nifty idea from Engadget (which is obviously a bit of a hoot), might just work, according to the technically advanced mind that posted it. He reckons that “with wireless connectivity, RSS 2.0/Atom compatibility, and a browser based control panel, it should get the job done.”

So to speak.

What an experience

Missing Link logoI had lunch with Rich and Dave today. I’m writing about it, because lunch is probably the first thing I’m going to forget. Rich and Dave are from Missing Link (one could even make a case for them being the ‘missing link‘). They’re just 2 parts of the team that buzz around their ’space’, doing what they do, but more importantly and pertinent to this post, creating an environment that ensures that every one of your senses is engaged at one point or another during the time you spend in their domain.

It starts with the bathroom you enter through to get to reception (I kid you not). You’re then accosted (in an extremely friendly manner) by Andre who bombards you with offers for coffee, cappuccino, coke, whatever. It’s the MTV playing on multiple TV’s in the ‘public space’ while you watch a row of creatives doing their thing on their notebooks (all Apple for those who care). It’s the electric shock lie detector and race challenge on the tables, along with the ‘roller ball’ car and the sumo wrestler electronic games. It’s Rich’s office done in a ‘bedroom’ theme with double bed. And Dave’s with an undertaker thing going on with coffin to boot. It’s the graffiti on the walls, the 2 Segways and the motor powered skateboards. It’s the black limo with red flames and tinted windows with the sticker that says, ‘wanna be porn stars in transit’ that transported us to lunch. It’s the energy, the passion and the vibe that’s going on as clients meet and interact with each other in between checking up on how their project is getting on while drinking another coffee expertly created by Andre.
Continue reading ‘What an experience’

iPod war heating up

iPod warsThe patent dispute between Creative and Apple over the music navigation system on portable players is old news.

Creative boss Sim Wong Hoo has told the BBC he plans to “pursue aggressively” a US patent it owns on a system used to navigate music on digital players.

But the release of the Zen Vision: M is sure to churn it up even more, especially when it’s clearly got an ‘iPod look’ happening all over it.

I can’t help but wonder how much energy, time and money is being used every minute in the entertainment industry ‘legal wars’? If it’s not the copyright issue, or the illegal copy issue, then it’s the patent issue. Could it be that more money could be saved by hiring fewer lawyers and replacing them with leaner, cleaner and more relevant business models?

For commentry on an interview between Sim Wong Hoo and BBC click here

“Podcast” declared ‘word of the year’

PodcastThis could be seen as another post giving you amunition for why you need an iPod for Christmas, or it could be an illustration of just how important social software has become.

The New Oxford American Dictionary has declared ‘podcast’ as word of the year, and will add it to it’s online version in it’s next update early next year.

“Podcast was considered for inclusion last year, but we found that not enough people were using it, or were even familiar with the concept,” said Erin McKean, editor-in-chief of the New Oxford American Dictionary.

“This year it’s a completely different story. The word has finally caught up with the rest of the iPod phenomenon.”

Click here for the story on BBC News. Or check out the Oxford University Press blog for words that didn’t make it.

They rule

LinksI came across a very intriguing web site (www.theyrule.net) today - the richness of the information, and the opportunities this could open up are amazing!

In a nutshell the site allows you to select any one of the top 500 US companies, expand it to see who’s on their board of directors, and look for linkages to board members of other top 500 companies - essentially you’re creating a social network with top 500 companies and their board members as the nodes. There is also a search function that allows you to search for a connecting path between two specified companies.

The information on the site is based on 2004 SEC filings and corporate web sites, so the accuracy may be questionable. The creators of the site also seem to have their own political agenda, but the technology and the idea behind it is extremely powerful.

Finishing Well - Boomers want to leave a legacy

I was recently recommended a book that sounds fantastic (its on my Christmas stocking filler list). Its “Finishing Well” by Bob Buford (Integrity Publishers, ISBN: 159145395X). (Purchase it online at Amazon.com or Kalahari.net).

It is written from a Christian perspective, but the focus on a spiritual legacy is but a small part of the overall message of the book. That message is on how to ensure that you leave a legacy as you head towards the later years of life. I believe the book includes a series of splendid interviews with well known people who are “finishing well”.

As the first of the generation of Baby Boomers born after World War II start to retire (and re-tyre) in 2006, this type of information is absolutely critical. I’m looking forward to getting the book.

What the Tourism industry needs to know about generations

“The American travel industry is staring at a generational divide. On one side are the deep-pocketed baby boomers, with more money and free time than ever. On the other are the burgeoning Generation Xers, whose oldest members turned 40 this year and who increasingly are asserting their buying power. The challenge facing hotels, golf courses, airlines, travel agents and tourism marketers around the country is how to appeal to two groups of consumers whose tastes could not be more different. Typical boomers look for a natural environment, luxurious decor and comfortable accommodations when they travel. Average Gen Xers want an urban environment, trendy decor and functional accommodations.”

So begins a great article, “Hotels face challenge of generation gap“, By Stephanie Paterik in The Arizona Republic (4 Dec 2005).

The older Silent generation is SKI’ing (Spending Their Kids Inheritance), and doing more global leisure travel than any retirees ever have before. Boomers are big business travellers. Xers are big leisure travellers, but want different levels of comfort and cultural experience to their older travelling counterparts. And, Xers are spending more on experiences than any other generation has ever done before. All this adds up to great opportunities, to those who understand the desires of these very different markets.

Paterik’s article is a short, but insightful, starting point for thinking about Minding the Generation Gap.

Bicycle charger for your iPod

iPod chargerHere’s a great innovation from a dude in the Netherlands. An iPod charger driven by his bicycle. Who else but the cycle mad Dutch could come up with an innovation like this.

It’s still true…. necessity is the mother of all invention!

Customer service Mike’s way

Tempest SIXT logoThere’s a young guy named Mike who heads up the Braamfontein Tempest/SIXT car rental office. He used to be based at Johannesburg International. He was moved to Braamfontein as part of a promotion? (Imagine what happens when you mess up?) Anyone who’s used Tempest/SIXT at Johannesburg International, while Mike was there, has probably met him. Big guy. Blond hair. Switched on and organised.

Mike is one of those people in the service industry that you have one interaction with and wonder why he’s not earning a 17 figure salary? His appraoch to the customer has always blown me away. And it’s not because it’s spectaculor razzle and dazzle. Mike just gets on with the job, treats you with dignity, remembers your name, bends the rules a little when you’re desperate, and he also sends you an sms on your birthday.
Continue reading ‘Customer service Mike’s way’

Google really has taken over the world… even us!

dTmTThanks to Rich…! over at JoBlog for helping us make the sale.

Check out our new home page

Flat Earth thinking when it comes to leadership

Getting LostFollowing a conversation with Nainoa Thompson ( a Wayfinder who navigates the Pacific Islands without the aid of instrumentation) I was left with an uneasy feeling concerning the contemporary norm when it comes to leadership formation.

But let me backtrack to the conversation with Nainoa.

He described in gripping detail the fear he experienced when navigating the Doldrums. It was the fear of getting lost. The Doldrums is a dangerous stretch of ocean and Nainoa described how he had to ‘close his eyes’ in order to navigate. Successful navigation required something beyond the traditional Western means. He went on to describe how he now welcomes ‘getting lost’ for the value of what gets learnt when lost. If fact there are things that can only get taught when one is lost - and that rich learning is what Nainoa has come to prize.
Continue reading ‘Flat Earth thinking when it comes to leadership’

Why you need an iPod for Christmas?

Santa iPodI just had a birthday. My amazing wife bought me an iPod Video. It replaces my iPod mini that’s given me hours of amazingness. I used my iPod mini for mostly travelling by plane to escape the mind-numbing experience of airline travel. As I discovered PodCasts I spent a lot less time listening to music, and a lot more time getting some great input from the various PodCasts I subscribe to. The iPod video will enhance my experience even more. (that’s the theory)

In our business we’ve started to video some of our presentations. We’re hoping it will not only share the knowledge of a virtual team, but act as a quality enhancement tool as well. We’ll now be able to give eachother contructive feedback on what we saw and heard.
Continue reading ‘Why you need an iPod for Christmas?’

For the hang of it

Money and emailIt’s a question I get asked often. Sure, the Web is evolving into a platform for ordinary people to share information with just about anyone who’ll look or listen, but why put information out there if you’re not making money off it? Why have a personal blog if people don’t pay to read it? Why put pics on Flickr for people to view and re-use at will, for free? Why podcast your valuable thoughts and insights if you’re not going to charge per download?

Seth Godin believes it has something to do with our new economy (ironic, seeing as economists are clueless as to this odd new “for free” trend). We call it the connection economy, in his recent post he refers to it as a hobby economy. Or at least this aspect of it. People have no qualms wearing their hearts on a digital sleeve, expecting nothing in return except for the satisfaction of knowing that it’s possible, and that someone, somewhere, experiences it.

From his post…

More and more people are spending more and more time (and money) on pursuits that have no pay off other than satisfaction.

It’s conceivable that money and love (in that order) are no longer the only things making the world go round.

How do you remain “cutting-edge”?

sand duneYesterday I attended a presentation by Prof. David Block on the Power of Vision. He gave us a wonderful metaphor when thinking of what it means to remain at the cutting edge as a business.

He asked us how much TNT it would take to move a sand dune in Namibia? The answer: none. All it takes is a beetle walking along the leading edge to disrupt (scratching) the line so that the wind can do its job in moving the dune.

So, remaining at the cutting edge is about knowing where to scratch, and embracing the ability to be wind-swept.

Technorati Tags:

James Blunt releases latest video on mobile phones first

England’s latest singing sensation may just be rescuing the single, by bringing it right up to speed with the latest technologies. James Blunt’s latest video, “Goodbye My Lover” was released for mobile phones exclusively on 21 November. This was done to customers of the 3 Network only, and will then be rolled out to others in time.

3 Network claims to have had more than 15 million videos downloaded (not just Blunt’s, but others they also have on offer). These are offered at about £ 1.50, and many artists are now making more money through this channel than through selling singles through music stores.

Read more from The Guardian, here.