<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking back to look ahead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tmtd.biz/2007/12/18/looking-back-to-look-ahead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2007/12/18/looking-back-to-look-ahead/</link>
	<description>An outlet for musings, observations and futureneering from the company helping you to transition into the connection economy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.connectioneconomy.com/2007/12/18/looking-back-to-look-ahead/#comment-430902</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmtd.biz/2007/12/18/looking-back-to-look-ahead/#comment-430902</guid>
		<description>Hey GC

I was recently at a international futures studies conference held in Stellenbosch.  Two things struck me. 
1) Most futurists are PATHETIC presenters.  With the quality of presentation seen at an international forum like that it is no wonder that Futurists &#38; Futurologists don't get the profile they deserve.
2) Everyone ignored the influence of the past on the future, and the application of futures methodology of Multiple possible futures to the past implying Multiple possible pasts.

The academic discipline touched on here is called CounterFactual History [also sometimes called Virtual History].  There are some links available from Wikipedia.  Alternatively, I can be contacted via TMTD for additional resources.

Ciao
Raymond</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey GC</p>
<p>I was recently at a international futures studies conference held in Stellenbosch.  Two things struck me.<br />
1) Most futurists are PATHETIC presenters.  With the quality of presentation seen at an international forum like that it is no wonder that Futurists &amp; Futurologists don&#8217;t get the profile they deserve.<br />
2) Everyone ignored the influence of the past on the future, and the application of futures methodology of Multiple possible futures to the past implying Multiple possible pasts.</p>
<p>The academic discipline touched on here is called CounterFactual History [also sometimes called Virtual History].  There are some links available from Wikipedia.  Alternatively, I can be contacted via TMTD for additional resources.</p>
<p>Ciao<br />
Raymond</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
